Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hidden Market Gems's avatar

Really good and interesting deep dive, thanks.

Expand full comment
ShowMeTheValue's avatar

I'm a big fan of TXN, but (as we've discussed before), given the automotive industry presence, I prefer companies with a stronger SiC / GaN foothold (despite the lower gross margins for these companies).

Your CapEx assessment is interesting to me. Are you aware of the stance Elliott Management took when they approached TI?

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/texas-instruments-txn-activist-elliott-fcf-alignment.html

My perception of this dialogue is that TI wanted to continue to invest bucketloads in CapEx, Elliott said, "are you sure you want to do this?", and TI then said, "maybe you're right, perhaps a FCF target is better". And dropped their CapEx plans.

As it happens, TI's CapEx was one of the things I called out in my deep dive of the Analogue Semiconductor industry, so I am glad to see this moderation, but it does make me wonder about the strategic direction of the TI BoM (if they can be persuaded to change their approach quite quickly by an activist).

Nonetheless, you are absolutely right - TI has been a titan for decades and is an incredibly strong company that I would be happy to hold if they had more SiC / GaN, were cheaper, and if I didn't already have holdings in the industry.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts